Re: Safe way to backup an RDB file

OK thanks for the reply.  I have a partition and all my entries are under
that partition.  What I replaced was the master.db from in system folder
not
in my partition folder so will it affect?

Hi,

I am using ApacheDs 1.5.4, after running successfully for a long time, now
getting the following error:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
        at
org.apache.directory.server.core.entry.ClonedServerEntry.<init>
        (ClonedServerEntry.java:67)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.jdbm.JdbmPartition.lookup
(JdbmPartition.java:457)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.ServerEntryCursorAdaptor.get
(ServerEntryCursorAdaptor.java:140)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.ServerEntryCursorAdaptor.get
(ServerEntryCursorAdaptor.java:40)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.filtering.BaseEntryFilteringCursor.next
(BaseEntryFilteringCursor.java:502)
        at org.apache.directory.server.core.authz.GroupCache.initialize
        (GroupCache.java:151)
        at org.apache.directory.server.core.authz.GroupCache.<init>
        (GroupCache.java:115)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.authz.AciAuthorizationInterceptor.init
(AciAuthorizationInterceptor.java:211)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain.register0
(InterceptorChain.java:439)
        at

org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain.register
(InterceptorChain.java:395)
        at
        org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain.init
        (InterceptorChain.java:255)
        at
       
org.apache.directory.server.core.DefaultDirectoryService.initialize
        (DefaultDirectoryService.java:1385)
        at
org.apache.directory.server.core.DefaultDirectoryService.startup
        (DefaultDirectoryService.java:840)
        at org.apache.directory.server.configuration.ApacheDS.startup
        (ApacheDS.java:126)
        at org.apache.directory.server.Service.init(Service.java:86)
        at org.apache.directory.server.UberjarMain.main
        (UberjarMain.java:56)

Most backup software programs    data offer some form of data .
Filtering allows you to filter certain types of files for backup. For
example, you can select to backup all of the images in your hard drive-
giving you the freedom to refine your data backup in ways that best
suit your needs. This tool is also available on most backup software.
http://www.geekzwa.com.au

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407

           Summary: backup manager reports too few current sessions
           Product: Tomcat 6
           Version: 6.0.20
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Cluster
        AssignedTo: de### @tomcat.apache.org
        ReportedBy: ma### @apache.org


With 100 sessions shared across 4 nodes (i.e. 25 active sessions per
node), the
delta manager reports 100 current sessions per node (25 active and the
copies
of the sessions from the other nodes). The back manager reports 25. For
consistency it should report 50. The 25 active sessions plus the 25 (or
so)
that are backed up on that node.

Hi,

Do implementations of Watcher need to be thread-safe, or can I assume
that process(...) will always be called by the same thread?

Thanks,
Josh "Ua" Ball

Hi all,

I use automatic unconditional data load from other sources into my
database. But data, already loaded, can be changed by users
(or updated by MR jobs, f.e. some foreign keys resolutions or text
cleanup).
My loaders can load same data once more (with old data) and possibly
override changes, made to stored data. I can't allow this.

Not long ago I asked subj on iirc, and answer was: it is
not safe to put old data (with old timestamps).

Now I use versioned qualifiers and store version in them. But this
is very hard to support and it is hard to use such implementation
with other tools (like hive or pig), it is hard to use with filters (i
should
use custom very specific filters), it is no support for ttl or num of
versions
in scan.

So, i want to ask againt. What is a best strategy in such situtaion.
I need to put old data and don't override if it exists. I don't want
place version
in key (it is the same complexity as in qualifiers).
My be here some plans to support such situation in 0.89?

It looks, that i can use solution with old timestamps, but it leads to
incorrect
answers (this new data from memstore) until hbase compact table.

PS:
to be more specific, here is example of my schema (sql like notation):

table bsn.main(
long pk

Thanks for any advise.
Andrey.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

Mark Thomas <ma### @apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas <mar### @apache.org> 2010-07-13
17:16:40 EDT ---
The diff is inverted and the patch is using tabs rather than spaces. I
should
eb able to work with that but you might need to fix it.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520

           Summary: SSI Servlet should support safe configuration
           Product: Tomcat 7
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: Catalina
        AssignedTo: de### @tomcat.apache.org
        ReportedBy: yair.### @citi.com


This is a duplicate request from the Tomcat 6 (Bug 48960). See proposed
solution/discussion:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

The current configuration of the SSI module is "All" or "None". The "ALL"
option will expose all the legacy Apache SSI directive (echo, printenv,
if,
exec, ...). As documented, allowing SSI will allow execution of arbitrary
programs using the "exec". As a result, there is no safe way to expose
sites/projects containing SSI directive, without taking a security risk,
or
reviewing of every file.

The "exec" directive, with the cmd option is a major risk. Even for
Apache, you
have the option to allowing the "safe" include (includeNoExec). The
includeNoExec allow pages to be served, even when the content is not
reviewed,
or when users are allowed to upload content to the site.

I have a big site which need to be converted into JSP. I would like to use
the
SSI servlet to allow for transition over time. The extra risk from ( from
exec
cmd) make it impossible to deploy the SSI.

My request: Modify the configuration of SSI as follow: By default, it will
only
allow "safe" directive (no exec cmd=...). This will eliminate the risk
from
arbitrary execution of commands ("del *.*"). It will also remove many
potentail
load problems. The cmd= should only be allowed using a directive like
"allowUnsafeExec", which will default to false.

I think that the change will make it easier to use the SSI feature,
without
exposing the server to big risk. The risk associated with the "safer"
version
of SSI is similar to the risk from running JSP pages.

A better alternative is to eliminate the "exec cmd=" option alltogether.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas <ma### @apache.org> 2010-06-29
12:45:54 EDT ---
*** Bug 49520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #5 from Yair Lenga <yair.l### @citi.com> 2010-07-09
10:01:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 *** Bug 49520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Mark,

Is there anything I can do to speed up the inclusion of this change ? I've
noticed it did not make it for 6.0.28, where few other CGI/SSI related
changed
were incorporated. I would love to use the SSI, but I can not use it
because of
the security reisk of the "unsafe" include/exec.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas <mar### @apache.org> 2010-07-09
10:17:16 EDT ---
Providing patches in diff -u format would help.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas <ma### @apache.org> 2010-07-13
18:08:34 EDT ---
Sorry truck should have been trunk and trunk == 7.0.x so it is already
there.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #7 from Yair Lenga <yair.### @citi.com> 2010-07-13
15:52:28 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25760)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25760)
Patch to disable exec by default, new allowExec tag

Patch for three files, created against 6.0.26-src

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #10 from Yair Lenga <yair.l### @citi.com> 2010-07-13
17:54:53 EDT ---
Mark,

Thanks for taking the change. I'll follow you suggestions regarding svn
diff
for the next time.

Do I have to submit anything for the change to flow to 7.X ?

Yair

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960

--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas <mar### @apache.org> 2010-07-13
17:38:55 EDT ---
In the end I used the patch a guide and write a new one. Some additional
comments:
- if you do an svn diff against a normal source tree patches usually apply
cleanly
- new features should be documented

The patch has been applied to truck and proposed for 6.0.x

Hi, i tried to setup share file system master/slave on activemq 5.3.2 , my
activemq.xml  is updated as below:

<broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"
brokerName="share"
useJmx="false" deleteAllMessagesOnStartup="true"
dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"
destroyApplicationContextOnStop="true">
....
<persistenceAdapter>
            <!--<kahaDB
directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"/>-->
            <kahaDB directory="//9.186.10.68/share"/>
        </persistenceAdapter>


//9.186.10.68/share is samba share opened on a suse 10.2 system with
anonymous access.

but when i start up activemq, there is an error:
Database \\9.186.10.68\share\lock is locked... waiting 10 seconds for the
database to be unlocked. Reason: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
\\9.186.10.68\share\lock (Access is denied)

Can somebody help figure out how to configure share file system? i just
followed this article
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-fil...master-slave.html, my shared
directory is setup wrong?
THanks a lot!

     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse...nels:all-tabpanel
]

Justin Edelson resolved SLING-1532.

    [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse...1#action_12874061
] 

Justin Edelson commented on SLING-1532:

Cached stream file deletion causing file not found errors